Excluding my father, Preston argued, represented an injustice that the court should correct.
He spent a great deal of time establishing tone.
He portrayed my father as an aging man who had been overlooked in his own family’s fortune. He described Vanessa as a devoted spouse advocating only for her husband’s rightful security.
Without saying so directly, he presented me as someone who had quietly accumulated wealth while allowing my father to worry about retirement.
It was a compelling story if one ignored every fact beneath it.
I remained still while he spoke.
My hands rested together on the table in front of me.
I had learned years earlier how to sit through adversarial briefings without reacting. Reactions were often what people wanted when they were constructing a narrative instead of presenting evidence.
When Walter’s turn came, he did not raise his voice.
He began laying out the documents one by one, methodical and unhurried.